No. 13-08-sixteen.

Defendant-appellant, Jay J. Jones, appeals from the judgment of the Seneca County Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Division, ordering him to pay plaintiff-appellee, Evelyn Jones, $8,, plus statutory interest from , court costs incurred, and $2,000 of Evelyn’s reasonable attorney fees. On appeal, Jay argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, that the trial court erred in finding for Evelyn as she failed to present sufficient evidence of unjust enrichment to meet her burden of proof, that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for failure to join an indispensable party, and that the trial court erred in awarding attorney fees and costs to Evelyn without a presentation of evidence on the issue. Based on the following, we affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.

JONES v. JONES

In December 1999, Evelyn filed a petition for dissolution of her marriage to Jay in the Seneca County Court of Common Pleas, a petition that incorporated a separation agreement. During the course of the marriage, the parties had purchased a business called the Whippy Dip, for which they took out a line of credit (home equity loan) on their residence at 628 Northview Dr., Fostoria, Ohio (the residence), to help pay expenses of the business.

The latest functions agree that Spouse will stay in your house and you may can be responsible for all mortgage payments, resources, taxes, insurance, and you will restoration for the said quarters * * * and should hold Spouse simple thereof. * * *

Because this home is additionally mortgaged within the 1999 toward good loan away from Partner’s to own his Whippy Drop providers, the newest functions further concur the following:

B. Husband will create punctual repayments in order to Trick Bank or their successor, into Whippy Drop financial, about what the niche assets over is also pledged just like the equity.

The newest activities are proprietors of real estate and providers found at eight hundred S. Fundamental St., Fostoria, Seneca State, Kansas, referred to as Whippy Drop. * * *

This new parties agree that Spouse will keep up with the said a residential property and you can Whippy Drop business and you can will likely be guilty of the mortgage money, tools, fees, insurance coverage, and you can repairs towards the said a residential property and you will business quickly abreast of finalizing associated with the agreement, and shall keep Spouse harmless thereof.

In , Evelyn filed a motion for contempt, or, in the alternative, a complaint for unjust enrichment, alleging that when she sold the residence, she was forced to pay off the remainder of the home equity loan for the Whippy Dip, which was Jay’s sole responsibility under the separation agreement, and that Jay refused to reimburse her for this payment.

In payday loans Lynn, Jay filed a motion to dismiss Evelyn’s complaint for unjust enrichment and motion for contempt on the grounds that Evelyn failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted, that the court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the action, and that Evelyn failed to join an indispensable third party, Key Bank.

In , the magistrate dismissed Evelyn’s motion for contempt, but found that her complaint for unjust enrichment properly stated a claim, that the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to enforce the separation agreement, and that Key Bank was not an indispensable party to the action.

Lou Ann Fleming, a relationship manager with Key Bank, testified that Jay had three loans that involved the Whippy Dip business. One loan was taken out on March 2, 1999, for $28,, secured by the real estate on which the Whippy Dip was located, another on March 2, 1999, for $55,, secured by 699 shares of Quest Communications Stock, and a third loan on February 8, 1999, that was a home equity line of credit for $44,000, secured by the residence; that two loans were dispersed from the home equity line of credit in e was not on the , Key Bank subordinated the home equity loan to a loan from Old Fort Bank. She continued that a title company contacted her to find out what amount was owed on the home equity line of credit because Evelyn wanted to the sell the residence and was required to pay off this loan before selling, but that she told the title company she was required to get Jay’s permission before releasing the payoff figures because Evelyn was not on the loan.